This is one of the most depressing plots I know -
Getting to the moon was significantly difficult to do in the
1960s than it is today, but still for some reason we don't go there. In the
1960s and the 1970s there was a cold war that caused enough motivation for J.F.
Kennedy to pile up the country’s resources outside the NASA headquarters to get
to the moon at any cost. Today, there is no cold war and economics has
dominated the decisions to end the shuttle program. We need economic demand to
go to the moon and we need to do this fast. I am going to do a few blog posts about
a few ideas I have thought of. Consider these as Elon Musk style open patents,
from someone who is significantly more lazier than him. We (humanity) must get some engineers out there to solve our problems.
What the world needs right now is a solution to the energy crisis.
The Moon probably does not have oil, considering oil was formed from once
fossilised life-forms. The Moon probably does not have coal or natural gas either for the same reason. What the moon has is a lot of barren land. What use is a lot of barren land that is visible from most of the Earth in the night time?
Meanwhile, the FIFA world cup has just concluded and there
has been a lot of talk in Brazil, over whether it was worth hosting it. Sports
are good. They are fun, bring the world together in friendly rivalry, boost
local economies, provide great conversation starters and are a welcome
distraction / entertainment source to the daily life. All of this comes at a
cost and it is a good idea to bring these costs down. I am sure the FIFA world
cup is expensive to host, one of the most visual expenses are the stadiums. The
stadiums are large and extravagant. All of them now have flood lights which
turn night to day at the stadium. This obviously is expensive to do, but night
matches are economically worth it. It makes the game happen at prime time, and an
artificial lights game is quite a spectacle.
It would be nice if we could play sport in the moon light,
but unfortunately moon light is not enough.
This is an engineering blog so “not enough” is not an acceptable answer. Illumination can be measured. The SI unit of the Illuminance is ‘lux’. This is what light meters measure. When a cricket umpire holds out a meter, he is measuring the light per square meter. The SI unit of light is candela, which is the amount of light provided by one candle (a definition, a bit like horse power, I am amused by the idea that there is a standard candle/horse somewhere in the world which was used as reference). For cricket ‘lights’ is offered to the batsman if the illuminance is less than a 1,000 lux. However, the FIFA regulations are tougher, demanding at least an average of 3,500 lux for an International televised game. Moon light at an average is 0.4 lux. So moon light is “not enough” by 17,500 times.
Why is the moon light so low? Moon light is essentially
Sunlight that is reflected by the Moon. The moon is at an average equally far
away from the Sun as the Earth is, so the illumination received by the moon is
the same as Earth on a sunny cloudless day, which is 1,20,000 lux. On a full
moon night, the Earth receives a small fraction of light reflected by the moon,
as this diagram will explain (Note the log scale).
The reflection co-efficient of the moon is 0.136 which means
that 13.6% of the light incident on the moon is reflected. The fraction of the reflected light that the Earth would
intersect is -
This value is ~.7 lux but the average illumination of the moon light measured on a clear night is 0.25, which means there is a 35.5% efficiency factor in there which accounts for light lost in the atmosphere (due to lack of clear skies) and averaging out of the fact that there is an angle of incidence involved both on Earth and on the moon.
This value is ~.7 lux but the average illumination of the moon light measured on a clear night is 0.25, which means there is a 35.5% efficiency factor in there which accounts for light lost in the atmosphere (due to lack of clear skies) and averaging out of the fact that there is an angle of incidence involved both on Earth and on the moon.
To have moonlight soccer, we need to start working on making
this more efficient. Let’s start with the reflection co-efficient - place
mirrors on the moon. We clearly need to go to the moon to do this. We have
managed to produce 99.99% reflecting surfaces but let’s cover the moon by 99%
reflecting mirrors. However, even if we cover all of the moon, our new ‘Disco
ball’ moon will only reflect ~7.2 times more light which is still nowhere
enough.
Only a fraction of the reflected light actually hits the
Earth, so the rest of the reflected light is wasted. We must have movable
‘sunflower mirrors’ that always point in the direction such that it reflects
light to Earth. These movable mirrors will directly impact the light spread
related efficiency factor. In fact, since all the light reflected by it is
directed towards the Earth this efficiency factor can go up very close to 1. If the entire Moon surface is used to
illuminate the entire Earth's night sky on a full moon day, the average illumination
would be -
Adding the 35.5% efficiency factor accounting for atmosphere
loss and angle of incidences, the average illumination of the Earth at night
would be 3090 lux which is enough to host a cricket match anywhere on Earth any
time of the day.
However, we still have all of the moon covered with
reflectors that illuminate all of the Earth. This is still wasteful and very
confusing to wild life.
We can consider reducing the effective
reflector size. To illuminate the all of the Earth with 3090 lux we need the
entire moon surface. To illuminate only a specified area on Earth with a
desired illumination, the reflector area on Earth can be calculated by -
For a cricket field to be illuminated by 1000 lux, we need
reflector area approximately 30 times smaller than a cricket field. For a FIFA match we can
do with the total reflective area of 10 times smaller than a football field.
They seem manageable, don’t they?
These reflectors can change their angle of incidence, which
means the same reflectors can light up a football match in Australia, Europe
and South America on a single day. Stadiums simply rent the reflectors on a
need basis and pay by the hour. Beyond sport, this gives us the power of shining
light on any part of Earth whenever necessary. Imagine how useful will it be to
literally light up a rescue operation if a train were to have an accident at a
remote location in the middle of the night. To light up 1 km of a 6 lane
highway as per this, we need only
~35 meter square of reflectors.
Anyhow, I'm looking
forward to sporting events scheduled as per the lunar calendar, and a cricket
match being interrupted by a lunar eclipse.
Hash-tag -> #GoToTheMoonAgain
P.S.: I also learnt that Photometry as a subject has one of the highest (Difficulty to understand / How simple it looks) ratio that I have come across. Also, solid angles are evil.
P.S.: I also learnt that Photometry as a subject has one of the highest (Difficulty to understand / How simple it looks) ratio that I have come across. Also, solid angles are evil.
What about the lunar phase? Not all parts of the moon are illuminated all 29.54 days. We would need a series of mirrors to be placed on the moon. To be specific, we need 29 mirrors of which only one mirror each will be usable on the end crescent days. The service won't be available on new moon though.
ReplyDelete